Pages

Thursday, October 8, 2026

Resident Evil 6 by Samhita adapa

 Resident Evil 6 by Samhita adapa

Ask a Resident Evil Fan what their least favorite game is and 99% of the time, their answer will be Resident Evil 6. Commonly referred to as “action-slop”, the game almost completely ignores the survival horrors aspects of the previous installments and almost entirely steers the direction of ship towards a Michael-Bay esque call of duty dupe. It’s pretty much an action arcade game and the reception almost entirely killed the franchise and Capcom. 

When I first played the game, I really enjoyed it. It was the first Resident Evil game I've ever played and as a huge wimp, a game where I could just run away instead of shooting was my holy grail. I quite liked the game and I replayed it a lot, that is until I played the other games. It’s crazy how bad Resident Evil 6 is compared to the others. It almost doesn’t do anything right. There’s barely any horror, repetitive, convoluted, and at some points just plain old boring. I tried replaying it after playing Resident Evil 4(2005) and I just couldn’t get myself to finish Leon’s campaign. It was just so boring. It’s so far removed from Resident Evil as a franchise that you could probably slap a different name on the disc and no one would know the difference. 

Action in Resident Evil isn’t new. It was introduced in Resident Evil 4 and continued into 5, arguably both great games. There was a good balance, though RE5 is a little bit more questionable. But I think RE6 just completely abandons all aspects of horror and completely leans into the action to draw in new fans. No part of the game was scary, even on my first playthrough. I was just plowing through zombies with no care. I didn’t care about preserving ammo or health. There was literally no survival aspect to it. And at some point, the campaigns became a chore, especially Ada’s. It was just so linear. You had to keep going, no time to stop, catch your breath. It felt like a race in all the worst ways. It tries to do everything which just convoluted it even more, especially with all the vehicle sections. There’s no wonder why it was met with such a negative reception. 

Despite all of this, there were aspects of the game that I really liked. I really enjoyed my first playthrough and I think if you don’t mind that it’s pretty much RE in name only, it’s really fun, especially if you play it co-op with another person. I think the melee attacks were the best part and I’m pretty sure I used those attacks more than the actual guns and I usually swear by the semi-auto rifle in all RE games. If you are new to resident evil, then I definitely wouldn’t recommend starting off this game and probably would encourage RE4 instead. However, I do think it’s important for someone to play through this game and form an opinion for themselves instead of only listening to online discourse around this infamous installment. 


Early Oscar Predictions: Best Actor Edition by Samhita adapa

Early Oscar Predictions: Best Actor Edition by Samhita adapa


Awards Season, arguably the best season of them all, is way too far in the future. With 3 months till the Golden Globes and then another 5 till the Oscars in March, it’s incredibly early to start making any predictions at all for practically any award, especially with half the front-runners only having come out in festivals so far and not having a wide theatrical release yet. Despite this, I’m ready to make my predictions and am pretty excited about them. 

Best Actor this year is stacked and in my opinion, on the same level as last year. With The Odyssey being as much of a blockbuster as it was, Matt Damon was a given for an Oscars Best Actor nom. He’s practically a lock. I don’t think I’ve seen a list without him yet and it’s incredibly valid. Damon was amazing in the film and deserving of the nomination. Do I think he should win? That’s another story. In my opinion, I feel like it was expected from Matt Damon. He was great but I don’t think there was anything ground-breaking about the performance? I felt the same way about DiCaprio last year in One Battle After Another. It was a very good performance no doubt, but I kinda expected that. I didn’t come out of the film gushing about his acting like I thought I would. If he does win, I think that’s just due to The Odyssey’s momentum in general. 

There’s also a case to be made for Robert Aramayo, who won the BAFTA last year for portraying John Davidson in the biographical drama I Swear. However, this nom is a little bit more unstable and almost non-existent just because the film came out so long ago. Most of the winning films come out during Oscar Season in the fall but I Swear came out April 2026. 

Project Hail Mary, another film that came out in March, seems to have the same narrative for Gosling but I don’t think he’ll win for another reason. I can maybe see a nomination but a win is a long shot. Practically a Hail Mary. Probably a Golden Globe nomination and maybe a win, but definitely not an Oscar. I think it’s just the film in general that hurts his chances. It’s very good without a doubt but I don’t think it’ll get any noms in anything other than in technical awards. I feel the movie, at least for the Academy, is of the same genre as the Marvel films. It’s definitely going to get nominated, but I doubt the wins are going to come flooding in. 

And now to Digger, probably my favorite movie of the year. Discourse about the movie aside, even though I absolutely loved the film, Cruise was phenomenal. I couldn't see him in the role and that’s exactly the same way I felt after watching him in PTA’s Magnolia. He’s dramatic, funny, and just great overall. However the movie bombed pretty badly at the box office and that isn’t really a recipe for success. This significantly hurt its chances in all categories, not just Actor. The film was ambitious and took a huge ton of risks and for me, it worked though I understand why others may not like the film. Despite this, you can’t deny Cruise was incredible. His campaign seems to be running with the long overdue narrative and Iñárritu got DiCaprio his first win so a lot of people are banking on that for a Cruise oscar. I definitely think he’ll get nominated but a win is a little more shaky, no matter how badly I want it to happen. 

Despite the incredibly strong front runners, there are still a lot of films that have yet to come out and will probably yield just as incredible actors who are deserving of nominations. To name a few, Pedro Pascal in Behemoth! or Malkovich in Wild Horse Nine. Not to mention Andrew Scott in Elsinore. Then there are the international films, particularly the absolute unit of a film that in La Bola Negra is becoming in all the Oscar prediction forums online. The takeaway from all of this? It’s probably way too early to make predictions and go watch Digger! #DigorDie


Monday, October 5, 2026

Beyond the Gray: Why My Elephant has Purple Shadows by Nandita Kamalakannan

 Beyond the Gray: Why My Elephant has Purple Shadows  by Nandita Kamalakannan


I recently decided to paint an elephant, which sounds like a great idea until you realize they are

basically just giant, walking mountains of wrinkles. But the hardest part wasn't drawing the trunk

—it was figuring out what color to make it. Since I can't show you the canvas in person, you will

just have to picture it in your head, but I promise it looks absolutely nothing like the gray

animals you see at the actual zoo.

Everyone paints with gray. Gray is safe and predictable. But after spending more than two years

taking art classes, I've learned that standard gray is a trap. It can get muddy, flat, and boring

incredibly fast. When I looked at a reference photo to sketch out the massive form of the

elephant, my first thought was: how do I make this look huge and luminous, instead of just heavy

and dull? That is why I made a single, non-negotiable artistic choice: absolutely no standard

black-and-white paint.

Instead, my elephant is a creature painted entirely in the cool tones of a deep jungle shadow. All

the deep wrinkles are filled with rich indigo and dark purple. The lighter parts of the trunk and

ears are layered with lavenders and blues. Using those cool tones makes the animal feel massive,

but also mystical and alive, like it is reflecting a completely different kind of light. To make the

contrast even more striking, I painted a vibrant, bold, almost fluorescent green jungle backdrop.

That bright green isn't there to look realistic; it is there to make the cool purple tones of the

elephant pop right off the canvas.

The point is, art isn’t about copying a photograph exactly as it exists. It is about deciding how

you want to see the world. It is taking a giant, stereotypically "gray" subject and finding the

secret colors hiding inside of it. Taking art classes has taught me to pause and find the vibrant

colors that everyone else walks right past. If you ever feel stuck on a flat, boring project, my

absolute best advice to you? Try painting it purple. You will never look at things the same way

again.

The Two-Dollar Masterpiece: Why Costco Pizza is the Best by Nandan Kamalakannan

 The Two-Dollar Masterpiece: Why Costco Pizza is the Best by Nandan Kamalakannan

When I was little, a trip to Costco always felt like an intense, hours-long expedition. It meant

navigating an endless maze of concrete aisles, dodging giant flatbed carts, and staring at

towering mountains of paper towels. But none of that mattered, because there was always an

unspoken promise at the end of the journey. If I survived the shopping trip, I would be rewarded

with the ultimate prize: a slice of Costco food court pizza that was literally bigger than my head.

Now that I am older, a lot of things from my childhood have lost their magic, but that pizza

remains a flawless masterpiece. People can argue all day about what makes a "real" or

"authentic" pizza. They talk about wood-fired brick ovens, imported tomatoes, and fancy

artisanal cheeses. I honestly do not care about any of that. If you ask me, the peak of culinary

perfection is a massive, incredibly greasy, two-dollar slice of cheese pizza handed to you on a

flimsy paper plate while you stand next to a bulk display of tires.

There is a specific science to eating it. Because the slice is so wide and heavy with cheese, you

cannot just pick it up normally. You have to master the strategic fold down the middle to keep the

structural integrity intact. The crust is always perfectly chewy, the cheese has those beautiful,

slightly charred golden bubbles, and it is always exactly the same. In a world where everything is

constantly changing and getting more complicated, there is something deeply comforting about

knowing that a Costco pizza tastes exactly the same today as it did when I was seven years old.

It is also the ultimate equalizer. Whether you are a little kid sitting in the front of a shopping cart,

a teenager grabbing a cheap dinner after hanging out, or an adult stocking up on groceries,

everyone completely loses their minds for the food court. It isn't trying to be fancy or gourmet,

and that is exactly why it is so good.

Sometimes, the best food doesn't come from a five-star restaurant with a massive waiting list.

Sometimes, it comes from a giant warehouse store right after you walk past a receipt-checker

with a yellow highlighter. Costco pizza is a childhood staple that never actually gets old, and I

will gladly defend it as the best slice in town.

Saturday, September 26, 2026

Forever-Lasting Friendships comparison of themes from The Lion & The Mouse and The Funeral by Sarvessh Senthamarai Kannan

 Forever-Lasting Friendships


Imagine having a heart-warming and everlasting friendship where it is just impossible to feel sad and depressed while being left alone? That is the theme of the two stories called The Lion and The Mouse by Aesop and Funeral by Ralph Fletcher. Portrayed through a chain-locked friendship where one is symbiotic and one is natural, these lifelong companions may have met in an unexpected way but are never ones to let each other down. These two stories contain many similarities and differences in their theme, but even through an unexpected friendship, true friends will never forget past memories. In short, these two stories and fables represent a relatable theme but represent them in different ways.

The story about The Lion and The Mouse and the Funeral both share one big theme, lifelong companions never let each other down due to their sincere recognition for each other. In the fable called The Lion and The Mouse by Aesop it states, ““Spare me!” begged the poor Mouse. “Please let me go and some day I will surely repay you.” The Lion was much amused to think that a Mouse could ever help him. But he was generous and finally let the Mouse go. Some days later, while stalking his prey in the forest, the Lion was caught in the toils of a hunter’s net. Unable to free himself, he filled the forest with his angry roaring. The Mouse knew the voice and quickly found the Lion struggling in the net. Running to one of the great ropes that bound him, she gnawed it until it parted, and soon the Lion was free.” This proves that the mouse which had been spared by the lion had come back to save him even at the cost of his own life. To further explain, this showcases an unexpected occurrence in terms of friendship, even though the mouse knew there was a sure risk in saving the lion, he bypassed all that just because of one simple act of kindness from the lion showing his true recognition for the generous Lion. 

Similarly, in the memoir called Funeral by Ralph Fletcher it explained, “Ralph Fletcher was a good friend. Last year I had to do summer school. He came by every day to walk me home.” “He was a good friend,” Larry agreed. “About a month ago, John Berkowitz tried to beat me up, and Ralph told John, ‘You’ll have to beat me up first.’ So, John Berkowitz punched him instead. He was a brave friend. Stupid, but brave!” Everyone laughed, including me. “He was a good friend,” Andy began, then stopped. I lay on the pine needles, eyes shut, smelling the mix of the piney smell and the good, rotting earth underneath. I waited for Andy to continue, but he didn’t say anything. Then he whispered: “He was the brother I never had.” This proves that even though Ralph is moving away from his friends, because his friends are so true to him, they even go as far as organizing time to praise their friend’s accomplishments in his “past life”. To further clarify, this is what truly makes a true friendship and strong relationship, even if one leaves the pack all the others must do something about it. To sum up, the theme of everlasting friendship which is shared between the stories The Lion and The Mouse and  Funeral explains that a simple act or kindness will always come back in a true bond of friendship.

On the contrary, even though both stories resemble a reaction to a life-long friendship, it is portrayed quite differently in both the story and the memoir since both occurrences have a different type of sentiment. For example in the story called The Lion and The Mouse it explains, “You laughed when I said I would repay you,” said the Mouse. “Now you see that even a Mouse can help a Lion.” This explains the sentiment of this action is more towards the serious and proving side. Even though the Lion and the Mouse are now friends, it develops more of a serious tone in the story rather than a loving and soft friendship. To delve deeper, since the Lion and the Mouse are both realizing the trust in each other and it shows a friendship portrayed through the action of realization and recognition. On the other hand, in the memoir called Funeral by Ralph Fletcher it implies, “Then he whispered: “He was the brother I never had.” “He was a member of the Four Stooges,” Larry said in a husky whisper. Then they all said together: “We’ll never forget him.” My eyes started to water. I tilted my head so they wouldn’t notice, and stayed quiet. Nobody spoke. I thought of all the things I’d done with these guys. Staying up late listening to the radio while the DJ counted down the top ten.” This means that the sentiment in this strong friendship is more of a remorseful and loving one since it is the last meet of five life long friendships. To further clarify, even though the theme can be the same between two stories, the sentiment is a big contributor and in this case a breaking point of a bonding friendship is definitely a more remorseful sentiment. This means that even though these two stories have a similar theme, they are portrayed differently through sentiments. 

To conclude, even though the fable The Lion and The Mouse and the memoir called the Funeral both share the same reccuring theme called life long companions never let each other down due to their sincere recognition for each other, they are portrayed through a different sentiment which is influenced by the tone and setting of the respective scenario. To conclude, if it weren’t for true friendships and strong bonds, love and recognition would be very scarce in the world making it a very boring place to live in.

Analysis of The Bad Case of Stripes by Sarvessh Senthamarai Kannan

 To start off, the theme of the short story The Bad Case of Stripes is to be yourself even

through criticism because only you know yourself best in and out. In the fictional story The

Bad Case of Stripes by David Shannon it states, “Camila Cream loved lima beans. But she

never ate them. All of her friends hated lima beans, she wanted to fit in. Camila was always

worried about what other people thought of her.” This shows that even though Camila knows

she deeply loves lima beans, she is afraid of what others might think of her. This triggers a

precautionary relationship between her and the lima beans; she wants to eat them with all her

heart but she is too occupied with what others think of her.

To further explain, a confident person is always someone who believes in themselves

and doesn’t listen to others' criticism. Being a confident person is the only way to pursue your

own dreams without obstacles. However, Camila is too focused on the other’s opinion and

thoughts about herself. This exposes Camila’s unconfident exposure and weak mindset which

collapses under others' negative pressure. To add on, in the story The Bad Case of Stripes it

also stated, “Camila wanted a big, heaping plateful of lima beans more than anything, but she

was still afraid to admit it.”

This proves Camila, who is diagnosed with a “contagious and harsh skin disease” even

now still doesn’t want to admit she loves lima beans more than anything. This shows that

even though Camila knows her situation is worsening she still wouldn’t take a lima bean

medication.

This exposes a very vital trait in Camila, the only reason she isn’t eating the lima beans

is because she is afraid of how others will interpret and judge her unique actions. To explain

further, even at a time of almost certain life and death, Camila is still precautious of what

others will think of her actions. This implies that she has a very low level of confidence and

assertiveness. To conclude, everyone should be assertive to themselves and not back down

for something they believe in because only they know best about themselves.

Too Very Thoughtful (a book review of Thank You Ma'am) by Sarvessh Senthamarai Kannan

 Too Very Thoughtful


Imagine being so thoughtful that you even invite a pick-pocket who tried to steal your purse for dinner? This is a perfect resemblance of Ms.Luella Bates Washington Jones in the meaningful story called Thank You, Ma’am by Langston Hughes. In the story, Ms.Luella is casually walking to her house when a rather dirty and poor boy tries to steal her pocket-book. Instead of sending him to jail or punishing him for purposely stealing, she realizes his family situation and takes him home to take care of.

Considering this impeccable and rare deed, Ms.Luella is an extremely thoughtful person because she is considerate, open-minded, and attentive. To start off, Ms.Luella is very thoughtful because she is very considerate. It is not very often that a person invites a suspicious and vulnerable person over to dinner let alone when they are trying to steal from them. However, Ms.Luella recognized that Roger, a poor boy, had no money, food nor proper sneakers. She deeply understood his financial status even though his actions were far from justified. In the story Thank You, Ma’am by Langston Hughes on page two paragraph seven it states, “Um-hum! And your face is dirty. I got a great mind to wash your face for you. Ain’t you got nobody home to tell you to wash your face?"

"No’m"; said the boy. "Then it will get washed this evening, said the large woman starting up the street, dragging the frightened boy behind her. He looked as if he were fourteen or fifteen, frail and willow-wild, in tennis shoes and blue jeans.” This proves that even though the boy looked suspicious and very suitable for a dark-hearted person, Ms.Luella took time to understand his situation physically and clean him up at her house. To explain further, Ms.Luella didn’t have to take the boy in to wash his face and take care of him. Even though the boy had attempted to commit theft of her pocket book, her thoughtful and considerate exposure made her take him under her wing. To add on, in the story Thank You Ma’am by Langston Hughes on page two paragraph eleven it explains, “The woman said, "You ought to be my son. I would teach you right from wrong. Least I can do right now is to wash your face. Are you hungry?" "No, said the dragging boy. I just want you to turn me loose" This implies that Ms.Luella is looking to help the boy and teach him the right way of life even though she knows it is not required of her. She even goes as far as asking him if he wants any particular things. To delve deeper, this shows her thoughtfulness and willingness to help others even if they are not the most convincing physically. That thoughtfulness exposes her very considerate mentality, open to always help others.

To summarize, because of the fact that Ms.Luella deeply considered Roger’s situation before criticizing him for his non-justified actions, Ms.Luella is a very thoughtful person because she is considerate of her options. Also, Ms.Luella is very thoughtful because she is very open-minded. As shown with her situation with Roger, she is always willing to listen to what others have to say. She knows exactly how important another person’s point of view is in order to come to a correct and reliable decision. In the story Thank You, Ma’am by Langston Hughes on page three into four it states, “Not with that face, I would not take you nowhere, said the woman. Here I am trying to get home to cook me a bite to eat and you snatch my pocketbook! Maybe, you ain’t been to your supper either, late as it be. Have you?" "There’s nobody home at my house; said the boy." "Then we’ll eat; said the woman, I believe you’re hungry—or been hungry—to try to snatch my pocketbook." "I wanted a pair of blue suede shoes; said the boy” 

This shows how patient and open-minded Ms.Luella is. Even with the fact that she knows this boy is unpredictable with his actions, she still takes the risk of letting him speak his heart out and justify his actions. This helps her determine a person’s character and intentions. To further clarify, Ms.Luella is risking her own property just to make sure that  poor and dirty Roger can live a better life under better circumstances. If she hadn’t taken that risk, it is possible maybe Roger would not turn out as a better person. Also coming from the story Thank You Ma’am by Langston Hughes on page four paragraph one, it states, "Well, you didn’t have to snatch my pocketbook to get some suede shoes said Mrs. Luella Bates Washington Jones. You could have asked me." " The water dripping from his face, the boy looked at her. There was a long pause. A very long pause. After he had dried his face and not knowing what else to do dried it again, the boy turned around, wondering what next. The door was open. He could make a dash for it down the hall. He could run, run, run, run, run! The woman was sitting on the day-bed." "After a while she said, I was young once and I wanted things I could not get." " There was another long pause. The boy’s mouth opened. Then he frowned, but not knowing he frowned.” This again shows Ms.Luella’s open-minded attitude. Even with the liability that this boy may do something bad, she voluntarily tries to fix the boy’s attitude with a kind and helping heart. To dive deeper, the action that Ms.Luella has taken is for sure a rare one, it is not likely that you see a middle-class person reacting in such a way that it even makes the thief cry and regret his wrongful actions. If not for Ms.Luella’s open-mindness, she would have never been able to understand Roger’s situation behind his dramatic actions. All in all, Ms.Luella’s kind actions towards Roger illuminates her heart and mind full of open-mindness.

Lastly, in Ms.Luella heart full of positive attitudes, she is also thoughtful because she is attentive. If she didn’t realize that Roger was in poverty, her thought process and attitude towards him may have been the complete opposite of what actually happened. In the story called Thank You Ma’am by Langston Hughes on page two paragraph seven it states, “Um-hum! And your face is dirty. I got a great mind to wash your face for you. Ain’t you got nobody home to tell you to wash your face?" "No’m; said the boy.” This means that Ms.Luella has noticed the boy's physical appearance. Not only has she noticed it, she used it to analyze the fact that he might not be financially stable and may not have a complete family to take care of him. Using this reliable and important piece of evidence, she changes her attitude towards the boy from questioning to understanding. To clarify, the only reason Ms.Luella changed her attitude towards Roger was because of her attentiveness. If she had not noticed his dirty face, she most likely would not have realized the type of person she was dealing with. However, because she carefully analyzed the situation with patience and attentiveness she was able to fully understand what was happening. Also, in the story Thank You Ma’am by Langston Hughes on page two paragraph ten it explains, “He looked as if he were fourteen or fifteen, frail and willow-wild, in tennis shoes and blue jeans. The woman said, "You ought to be my son. I would teach you right from wrong. Least I can do right now is to wash your face. Are you hungry?" This insists that Ms.Luella has noticed Roger’s rather out of order clothes. The fact that she even considered this is exceptional but the fact that she used it to determine his status and character is top notch attentiveness. To explain, the normal human brain thinks in small pieces, it breaks apart pieces of information to help it understand the situation in more context. However, Ms.Luella has barely used any time and yet she has analyzed Roger’s real inner character and intentions to uncover why he has attempted theft. To summarize, because Ms.Luella is so thoughtful because she is attentive towards others’ actions and intentions along with their physical appearance, one thing is for sure, she would make an exceptional detective.

To conclude, even though Roger may have looked like the classic inconsiderate pick-pocket to the normal person’s eye, because Ms.Luella is so thoughtful because she is considerate, open-minded, and attentive, she is able to completely deconstruct and analyze a person’s character and real intention behind an suspicious action. For sure she would make great friends with Sherlock Holmes.

About Me by Sarvessh Senthamarai Kannan

 Science has always been my greatest passion, and from a young age, I have

been fascinated by how and why things work. Over the years, I’ve realized that my

ability to work well with others, think independently, dedicate myself fully to any task,

and learn quickly has helped me succeed in science and school. Combined with quick

thinking, strong intuition, creativity, and a slightly photographic memory, these qualities

have guided my achievements and motivate me to reach even greater goals, like

becoming a NASA scientist. Teamwork has always been one of my strongest qualities

because I know that every successful experiment or project begins with collaboration.

Sharing ideas, communicating clearly, and combining strengths are essential to solving

problems effectively. During group assignments, I make sure everyone’s ideas are

heard while helping keep the team organized and focused. Working together allows me

to learn from others’ perspectives, build on their creativity, and contribute positively.


At the same time, I am very capable of working independently, which is equally

important in scientific discovery. My fifth-grade electromagnetism project best

demonstrates this, where I investigated how the movement of magnets in water could

generate energy. I designed the setup, tested different configurations, and measured

the electrical output, troubleshooting and refining my approach multiple times. This

project earned second place in my school science fair and strengthened my intuition,

creativity, and slightly photographic memory, allowing me to notice patterns and retain

key observations for analysis. Completing this project also showed that I am a fast

learner, quickly understanding the principles behind energy generation and adjusting my

experiment effectively. Beyond electromagnetism, I have explored other hands-on

projects, such as building a model rocket to understand thrust and balance, and


experimenting with plant growth under different light conditions. Each project required

planning, observation, and adjustments, reinforcing that independent work is about

thinking critically, exploring creatively, and taking ownership of learning. My ability to

solve problems efficiently and recall details allows me to approach challenges

effectively and develop solutions in unique ways.


Dedication is another quality that defines me and connects naturally to both teamwork

and independence because success in science requires persistence and commitment.

When I commit to something, I give it my full energy and attention. I do not leave tasks

unfinished or done halfway; I aim to understand every detail and ensure my work is the

best it can be. Whether preparing a science fair project or designing an experiment, I

put in the time and effort needed to succeed. Persistence turns failed attempts into

discoveries, and dedication drives me to pursue science and math outside of school,

deepening my knowledge and strengthening my skills. Ever since I was little, I have had

a strong interest in science and math, enjoying the challenge of thinking critically, asking

questions, and exploring new ideas. My goal is to become a NASA scientist, studying

space and expanding our understanding of the universe.


In conclusion, my ability to collaborate effectively, work independently, stay dedicated,

learn quickly, and combine quick thinking, intuition, creativity, and slightly photographic

memory makes me a strong candidate for the Science Olympiad team. My

achievements in science fairs, especially my fifth-grade electromagnetism project

exploring how moving magnets in water can generate energy, are just the beginning of

what I hope to accomplish.

A False and Junky Judgement (Book Review of Mr. Peabody's Apples) by Sarvessh Senthamarai Kannan

 A False and Junky Judgement


Imagine being judged and wrongly assumed when actually trying to be the best you

can. This situation occurred in a short fictional story called Mr.Peabody’s Apples by Madonna

where a man named Mr.Peabody spreaded kindness to his community all throughout, but all

he got was wrong judgements and thoughts full of hate saying that he stole an object. While

on the contrary Mr.Peabody actually payed the fruit seller(Mr.Funkadeli) in advance. The

theme of the story is to never judge a book by its cover, for the pages may hold a different

meaning.

To begin with, the theme in the story Mr.Peabody’s Apples is to never judge a book by

its cover since the most reasonable thought may not always be the truth. This is because in

the story Mr.Peabody’s Apples it explained, “Here Mr. Peabody would stop and admire Mr.

Funkadeli’s fresh apples. He would pick out the shiniest apple, drop it in his bag, and continue

on his way. Across the street, Tommy Tittlebottom watched with curiosity as Mr. Peabody

walked away with the apple.“That’s strange,” Tommy said to himself. “Mr. Peabody didn’t pay

anyone for the Apple.” Tommy got on his skateboard and rushed to tell his friends.” This

shows that Mr.Peabody, an innocent man is getting accused of stealing an apple when in

reality he is just admiring its shiny appearance and round structure. Instead of looking closely

at this, Tommy, a normal bystander, took a quick glance and wrongly judged the situation. To

explain further, Tommy should have looked carefully and should have considered his past and

prior knowledge of Mr.Peabody. If only he had remembered and had given himself enough

time to consider that Mr.Peabody is a responsible and respectable man, his thoughts and

judgements of the situations would have been drastically different. To add on in the short story

Mr.Peabody’s Apples it also stated, “Billy picked up the balls and bats, and Mr. Peabody set

off on his walk home. He waved to everyone he knew, and they waved back. Once again, he

stopped outside Mr. Funkadeli’s fruit market, picked up the shiniest apple, dropped it in his

bag, and continued on his way. Across the street, Tommy Tittlebottom and his friends

watched Mr.Peabody, and they were amazed at what they saw. Mr. Peabody had not paid for


his apple. They couldn’t wait to tell all of their friends, who told their parents, who told their

neighbors, who told their friends, in the town of Happville (which wasn’t a very big town).” This

thoroughly proves that Mr.Peabody is innocent because of how inattentive the townspeople

are. Even though they did not even see the event unfold, the townspeople are so quick to

jump to conclusions and judgements. To further clarify, it is not human to just look,glance,

process and judge. It is always the right thing to make sure you have the right information and

data before judging and publicizing a person’s actions since the thing that looks right cannot

always be correct. Sometimes looks can be deceiving and will invite you into destroying

another’s well earned reputation. In summary, not all that is white is milk, looks can be

deceiving and should never be used to quickly judge someone.

Also, another lesson that is in the story Mr.Peabody’s Apples is to never judge a book

by its cover since you might not always be fully right. This was proven time and again in the

short story Mr.Peabody’s Apples when it showed, “Oh dear, Mr. Peabody,” said Tommy, on

the doorstep. “I didn’t understand. I should not have said what I said, but it looked like you

hadn’t paid for the apples.” Mr. Peabody’s eyebrows went up a little, and he felt a warm

breeze blow across his face. “It doesn’t matter what it looked like. What matters is the truth.”

This proves that even though it looked like Mr.Peabody stole the apple and that the owner

didn’ notice, judging him from a far distance and saying that he is a thief is not the most

accurate judgment. This means that even though the evidence and situation are shining

towards a judgement, it is always possible to be wrong. To go in more depth, Mr.Peabody was

seen somewhat supposedly “stealing an apple” twice by Tommy. However even if the

evidence is shiny, bright and attractive to an intuitive judgement, it is still always possible to be

wrong because the human brain is always quick to make assumptions. The right step is to

always think twice and analyze a person’s character traits before judging them. To add on, in

the story Mr.Peabody’s Apples it similarly explained, “Aren’t you at the game?”“There wasn’t a

game today,” said Mr. Peabody, “and I was wondering if I could take my apple earlier than

usual?” “Sure, why not?” replied Mr. Funkadeli. “You pay for them every Saturday morning

when you pick up your milk. You can take them when you like. You want the big shiny one,

Mr. Peabody?” Mr. Peabody took his apple, smiled, and offered it to Billy.” This proves that

Mr.Peabody actually pays for his apples in advance and always picks them up at the same

time. Though on the outside it looked as if he didn’t pay Mr.Funkadeli for the apple, in reality

he was actually being responsible and paid for it ahead of time. In more depth, if Mr.Peabody

had not kept his cool and didn’t explain what had actually happened, everyone would have

naturally thought that he was a nasty thief who breaks other's trust. Instead, even with

knowing the others are wrong, Mr.Peabody calmly walked Billy over to Mr.Funkadeli to show

him what the real deal was. This proves that even though the door might not look right, if you

actually open it and look inside your judgement might change for the better. In conclusion,

judging a situation by its looks and evidence might be the right option, because there is

always room for a wrong and guilt filled judgment.


Lastly, another moral in the story Mr.Peabody’s Apples is to never judge someone since

the second hand information might not always be correct. In the short story Mr.Peabody’s

Apples it stated, ““That’s strange,” Tommy said to himself. “Mr. Peabody didn’t pay anyone for

the apple.” Tommy got on his skateboard and rushed to tell his friends.” This shows that

Tommy is going to tell his friends about Mr.Peabody with the wrong information, this will result

in them believing his wrong judgment and spreading false rumors themselves. This is a

foreshadow to a false accusation later in the story. To explain more, since Tommy didn’t think

twice before spreading his false and wrong information, false information about the very

respectable Mr.Peabody was revealed, leading to ruining his reputation. If the other

townspeople had not fully believed Tommy’s second hand information, no-one would have

falsely judged Mr.Peabody. This proves that second hand information cannot always be

reliable and can always have errors, it is always the right thing to cross-check it. To add on, in

the short story Mr.Peabody’s apples stated,“Tommy Tittlebottom and his friends said they saw

you take an apple from Mr.Funkadeli’s fruit market, twice, and they said you didn’t pay for

them,” answered Billy.

“Ahh,” said Mr. Peabody, putting his hat back on his head. “Let’s go and talk to Mr.

Funkadeli about it, shall we?”

They walked down the main street (which wasn’t a very big street), and Mr.

Peabody waved to all the people he knew, but now some of them did not wave back, and

some pretended they did not even see him.” This proves that everyone has been fools and is

believing false second hand information from a fool who isn’t sure about his judgment himself.

To lead into the false information about Mr.Peabody spreading like fire. To explain further,

since Tommy falsely accused Mr.Peabody of theft, Mr.Peabody’s rightly earned reputation

regarding respect and discipline was ruined. This means that though Tommy had the most

humanly thought, his evidence and realization was unreasonable. A man who is serving the

community with his heart will for sure not betray it for a simple apple.

In conclusion, the short fictional story by Madonna named Mr.Peabody’s Apples

explains the message of how not to quickly judge someone even in the most straightforward

circumstances. The character Mr.Peabody was a very respectable and disciplined man who

never thought twice to serve his community, however he ended up being falsely accused and

deserted by his own townspeople. Altogether, it is never the right thing to judge someone by

their actions at first glance since a book's pages might contain different information than the

cover.

Debugging a Tomato Plant: Why Gardening is the Ultimate Reset by Nandita Kamalakannan

 Debugging a Tomato Plant: Why Gardening is the Ultimate Reset

If you had told me a year ago that I would willingly spend my Saturday mornings digging around

in the dirt, I would have laughed. Gardening always seemed like a hobby reserved strictly for

retired people or anyone with way too much free time. But after spending most of my week

staring at screens and stressing over grades, I discovered that growing things is actually the

perfect antidote to high school burnout.

My brain is usually running a million miles an hour. Between trying to hunt down a single

missing semicolon in a Java project, calculating torque and angular momentum for AP Physics,

or grinding through calculus limits, everything in my life feels incredibly rigid. In school,

everything is pass or fail. Your code either compiles or it crashes. Your physics answer is either

mathematically sound, or it is completely wrong.

Out in the garden, the rules are completely different. You can't force a pepper plant to grow faster

by cramming an all-nighter, and you can't optimize a sunflower. You just plant the seed, make

sure it has enough water and sunlight, and then you have to actually wait. It is a massive exercise

in letting go of control, which is terrifying but also deeply relaxing.

When you are outside pulling weeds or trying to figure out why the leaves on your tomato plant

are suddenly turning yellow, you aren't thinking about college applications or standardized tests.

You are just completely focused on keeping this tiny, fragile living thing alive. It forces you to

log off, step away from the blue light of your laptop, and actually get mud under your

fingernails.

We spend so much time in an artificial, high-pressure digital world that we forget how to just

exist in the physical one. It turns out that getting your hands dirty and watching a seed you

planted actually sprout is one of the most rewarding things you can do. It doesn't look like much

on a resume, but it does wonders for your sanity.

THE AP MARATHON, a poem by Nandan Kamalakannan

 THE AP MARATHON


The syllabus drops like an anchor of lead,

A mountain of chapters to hold in your head.

The midnight lamp burns as the coffee grows cold,

A marathon journey of the brave and the bold.

You chart out the limits approaching to zero,

Hoping the friction won't conquer the hero.

You map the parabolas, finding the focus,

Praying the formulas aren't hocus-pocus.

There's torque and momentum that spin on a wheel,

And simple harmonic vibrations you feel.

Then over to Java, where objects await,

Constructing the classes and setting the state.

Compiling the logic with syntax so strict,

Chasing the bugs that you couldn't predict.

You graph out the shifts on the supply curve line,

As your marginal utility starts to decline.

You weigh all the costs of the choices you make,

When sleep is the ultimate trade-off you take.

The balance is brutal, the schedule is tight,

Between crushing a serve and studying all night.

You swing for the baseline and run down the court,

Then trade in the racket to write a report.

When May finally arrives with its bubbles and seals,

The ticking clock shows you how pressure truly feels.

But all of the rigor, the friction, the strife,

Is building the engine you’ll use in your life.

Teens Voting Age Should Change by Pankti Jain

 Right now in Britain, teens the age of 16 are given the eligibility to vote, but not here in America. Isn't Americaknown for being, ‘the land of opportunity’? Then why aren't teens allowed that voting option in the United States?

The voting age has been at 18 for a really long time, and now younger teens want to have that same voting right, and they should be able to get it. Teens have been fighting for this right for quite a while, and it should finally be the time for them to be allowed to vote. The limited voting age should be lowered so more people can vote because it lets teens be heard, there are no ‘wrong’ votes, and it gives teens their earned rights.

The first thing to consider is that lowering the voting age allows teens to voice their opinions. Vikrant Kamat, a sophomore at Upper St. Clair High School, argues that, “If I am old enough to be taxed, I should be old enough to be heard.” This demonstrates how teenagers are feeling very deeply about their right to be able to vote. Many teens like Vikrant want to be heard and want to have a say in their government, but they are not allowed to because of the restricted voting age. There are many teenagers that are in the same situation, they are getting taxed by the authorities, but are not allowed to publicly poll for who the authorities are, which denies their opinions. Vikrant Kamat also says that the government, “takes teenagers' money while dismissing their voices.” This also shows how teens are
being taken advantage of with their money but they aren't allowed to vote and aren't able to speak about how they feel politically. And this is unrighteous because it pushes away their concerns and rejects their voting input which they should be allowed to have.

Another thing to take to context is that it is not possible to cast a ‘wrong vote’ when voting. One of the main reasons that teenagers aren't given the chance to vote is because they vote according to misinformation, but don't adults also vote on incorrect facts? Vikrant Kamat states that, “Many vote based on habit, emotion or family influence. That reality is accepted as part of democracy.” This indicates that even the people that are eligible to vote right now are making unthought about votes and everyone is fine with that, but it is not acceptable if some teens might vote like that. People are being very unfair about this because they feel like teenagers will vote on the wrong side during elections, but that just simply isn't reasonable because they are voting how they want, just like everyone else, so their vote can't be ‘incorrect’. Vikrant also argues that she is, “not arguing that every teenager is ready to vote wisely. Neither is every adult. Democracy has always accepted that risk in exchange for fairness and legitimacy.” But if everyone is completely fine with adults voting ‘wrongly’, why do they care so much if teens do the same? This shows just how unfair the government is about their voting policy. And in any case, a ‘wrong vote’ is an incorrect thing to say because every vote is right, for it is each single person's choice on what they want to vote for. 

Also, experts argue that “the change could increase turnout but not necessarily sway elections, while finding that 16- and 17-year-olds were actually more likely to vote than those who got the vote at 18.” (Should 16-Year-Olds Be Allowed To Vote?). This proves that if the government changes the voting age, it won't be much of a difference other than the teenagers feeling fulfilled that they made their mark in this country. Plus, this shows that their ‘wrong’ vote can't change much in the political vote because it just makes up for the people that aren't voting. This also straightforwardly shows that the younger teenagers that don't have the ability to vote are more expected to vote than the people that already have that chance, proving that they should lower the voting age for people that are more passionate about this topic.

The final reason that teens should be allowed to vote is that voting gives them their equal representation and rights. Most teens around the age of 16 have jobs, and from the money they get paid with, they are forced to take taxes out of it. Ever since the creation of America, there has always been an argument about who is allowed to vote, and something that drove that argument was a famous saying, “No taxation without representation!” This shows that even our ancestors believed that everyone should have the right to vote and everyone should have the same ability to be represented. It is completely unfair that these teens are forced to pay a fee out of their well earned money from their jobs, yet they aren't allowed to vote for the people that this money that they are giving is going to! Letting these teens vote for who should be in the government gives them their earned representation in the economy, and gives them
their rights that they should already have. In the New York Times Newspaper article by Jeremy Engle, a director of Vote16USA, LaJuan Allen, states that, “It is youth up and down this country, no matter the political party, that are pleading with adults to get these things right...Because they are most significantly impacted by the decisions that are made today.” This proves that teens are the ones that are mainly affected by the government and what they do, so they should have the right to vote who is in it. By letting teens vote on these issues that control them, it makes them actually feel equally as a part of the country and lets them present themselves while using the rights they are entitled to have.

Though some may argue that teenagers shouldn't be allowed to vote because they are not ready, many others believe that teens are actually mature enough to make voting decisions. While it is true that some 16 year olds are irresponsible and unsensible, most of them surprisingly juggle more responsibilities than you may think. For example, Vikrant Kamat argues that, “Teenagers are already entrusted with serious responsibilities, with some working, managing school and job schedules, and in some cases, taking care of their younger siblings.” This evidence shows that teens already have so much responsibility, they can also take on the responsibility of being allowed to vote. Since they already
manage all these tasks, it proves that they are mature enough to be in the ballot. Also, another thing that proves that teenagers are prepared to vote is that they are introduced to civic information ever since they are in school. The New Jersey Student Learning Standards-Social Studies declare that students must be, “civic-minded, globally aware, and socially responsible.” This undoubtedly proves that teens are mature and knowledgeable enough to be able to vote because they have the public understanding. These 16 year olds have been taught about the government and voting ever since 6th grade, and now they are in 11th grade, which shows that they have the experience to vote and they should be allowed to.
The voting age restriction has been an ongoing debate for a very long time and it is about time we change that because it helps teenagers empower their political thoughts, votes can not be ‘wrong’, and because letting teens vote provides them with the representation that they deserve. Everyone deserves the right to vote, and since 18 year olds can vote, there is no harm in giving 16 year olds that opportunity as well. It is crucial that the government should change the voting age requirement to help support our country when choosing our leaders. So in the end, the right thing to do is lower the voting age to encourage teenagers' suffrage and benefit the political vote, as well as to benefit the teenagers themselves.


Works Cited

Engle, Jeremy. "Should 16-Year-Olds Be Allowed to Vote?" New York Times (Online), 04 Sept. 2025. ProQuest;

SIRS Discoverer, https://explore.proquest.com/sirsdiscoverer/document/3274996237?accountid=64167.
Kamat, Vikrant. "The Government Wants My Money but Not My Thoughts." Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, 04 Jan.

2026, pp. D-6. ProQuest; SIRS Discoverer,
https://explore.proquest.com/sirsdiscoverer/document/3290996832?accountid=64167.

New Jersey Student Learning Standards -Social Studies. June 2020,
www.nj.gov/education/standards/socst/docs/2020NJSLS-SS_Grades6-8.pdf.

Tuesday, September 22, 2026

Movie Theaters vs. Home Streaming by Aaliyah Sharma

 Movie Theaters vs. Home Streaming


        With the rise of instant streaming services, the home viewing setup has never been more comfortable. Today, you can pause a film whenever you want, eat whatever snacks are in your pantry, and lie on your own couch without spending twenty dollars on a ticket. Home streaming defenders argue that the traditional movie theater is an overpriced relic of the past. Yet, despite the convenience of watching a movie in your pajamas, streaming at home strips away the very essence of cinema. The movie theater remains superior because it forces a rare level of single-minded focus and delivers a shared emotional scale that a living room screen simply cannot replicate.

        The fundamental issue with home streaming is the endless ocean of ambient distractions. When you watch a movie at home, you are surrounded by everyday interruptions: family members walking through the room, household chores waiting to be done, and the constant urge to check your phone. The pause button, while convenient, destroys narrative momentum. A two-hour story gets stretched across three hours of social media scrolling and snack breaks, fragmenting the plot and diluting its emotional impact. A movie theater, by contrast, is a sacred, distraction-free vault. Darkness settles over the room, the phone goes into your pocket, and for two uninterrupted hours, your full attention belongs entirely to the story on the screen.

        Furthermore, there is a massive technical and visual difference between a television and a giant theater screen. Directors build movies for scale, framing shots with fine detail, complex color grading, and dynamic sound design meant to rumble through a room. Watching a high-budget film on a small television or a laptop screen shrinks that artistic vision down to a domestic scale. The massive screen and immersive surround sound of a theater force you to absorb the film with your entire body, turning a passive viewing habit into an active sensory event.

         There is also an undeniable social magic to watching a movie alongside a room full of strangers. Laughing together at a comedy, feeling a collective gasp during a plot twist, or sensing the total silence of a tense thriller creates a shared human energy that sitting alone on a couch completely lacks. A theater transforms a movie from simple content into a collective event that stays in your memory long after the credits roll.

         Home streaming is certainly convenient for rewatching old television shows or catching up on casual background noise, but it is a poor substitute for true cinema. Movies are meant to be experienced, not just consumed between phone notifications. By demanding your complete presence, the movie theater honors the art of storytelling in a way no living room ever can.

Aaliyah Sharma

Texting vs. Calling by Aaliya Sharma

 Texting vs. Calling

        In the early days of personal phones, a phone call was the default method of getting in touch with someone. If you needed to share news, ask a question, or make plans, you dialed a number, waited for an answer, and engaged in a live conversation. Today, however, calling someone out of the blue is increasingly viewed as an unwelcome intrusion. Text messaging has replaced the phone call as the primary way we communicate, and for good reason. Texting respects time, eliminates conversational fluff, and gives both parties complete control over their daily focus.

        The primary issue with an unscheduled phone call is that it demands immediate, total attention. When your phone rings, you are forced to stop whatever you are doing, clear your mental focus, and engage on the caller's timeline. It treats the recipient's schedule as entirely secondary. A text message, by contrast, is inherently asynchronous. It delivers information cleanly without forcing an instant pause on the receiver's life. The recipient can read the message when they have a free moment, think through a thoughtful response, and reply without disrupting their current task.

        Furthermore, texting is vastly superior for logistics and clarity. If someone tells you an address, a meeting time, or a list of items over a phone call, you are forced to memorize it on the spot or scramble to write it down. Once the call ends, the details exist only in your memory. A text message creates an automatic, searchable digital record. You can refer back to the exact wording three days later to double-check details, completely eliminating the confusion and miscommunication that often follow a verbal conversation.

       There is also an argument to be made for social efficiency. Phone calls are notoriously filled with necessary social filler—small talk about the weather, awkward pauses, and drawn-out goodbyes that stretch a thirty-second question into a ten-minute commitment. Texting strips away that unnecessary friction, allowing people to state their point directly while remaining polite. For quick updates and casual check-ins, it accomplishes the goal with maximum respect for everyone's energy.

         Phone calls certainly have their place for urgent emergencies or deep, personal conversations where tone of voice matters. But for the vast majority of daily communication, demanding live voice contact is simply outdated. Text messaging provides a polite, efficient, and permanent way to stay connected without demanding that the rest of the world pause what they are doing to answer.

Aaliyah Sharma

Why The Front Seat Always Wins by Aaliyah Sharma

 Why The Front Seat Always Wins


        There is a universal language spoken by high schoolers the second a group of friends approaches a car: calling "shotgun." The scramble to claim the front passenger seat isn't just about avoiding a middle-seat crush in the back; it's a battle for control over the entire trip. While sitting in the back allows you to zone out, the front seat provides a level of comfort, visibility, and unspoken authority that riding in the back simply cannot match.
        The primary advantage of the front seat comes down to pure physical legroom and personal space. Backseats in most cars are notorious for tight quarters, especially when three people are squeezed shoulder-to-shoulder. In the front, you get an adjustable seat, your own climate controls, and enough space to stretch your legs without kicking a seatback. You are treated like an equal partner in the ride rather than luggage stored in the rear.
        Beyond physical comfort, riding shotgun carries a distinct operational responsibility that makes the drive far more engaging. The front passenger acts as the driver’s official co-pilot. You are tasked with managing the navigation map, handling the music playlist, and opening snacks. Controlling the aux cord alone gives you complete influence over the vibe of the entire trip. Instead of just being along for the ride, you are actively shaping the experience for everyone in the car.
        There is also a huge difference in the visual experience. Staring at the back of a headrest while looking out a side window feels passive and disconnected, and for anyone prone to motion sickness, it can be a nightmare. In the front seat, you have an unobstructed view of the windshield. Watching the road unfold in real time gives you a sense of direction and awareness that keeps you grounded and comfortable throughout the drive.
        While sitting in the back offers a quiet retreat, it isolates you from the core energy of the journey. The front seat gives you legroom, influence over the music, and the best view of the road ahead. Claiming shotgun isn't just a petty vehicle race, it's securing the best seat in the house.

Aaliyah Sharma

Why In Person Shopping Is Better Than Online by Aaliyah Sharma

 Why In Person Shopping Is Better Than Online


        We are constantly told that online shopping is the absolute peak of modern convenience. With a few taps on a screen, you can browse thousands of stores, compare prices instantly, and have a box waiting on your doorstep within a couple of days. Digital storefronts promise an effortless experience free from crowded aisles and long checkout lines. Yet, despite the endless algorithms and instant checkout buttons, shopping in a real, physical store provides a far superior and much less frustrating experience than relying on a screen.
       The biggest flaw of online shopping is the total gamble on quality and fit. A jacket might look perfectly structured and vibrant on a model online, only to arrive feeling like thin plastic and fitting two sizes too small. Product photos are notoriously edited, and glowing reviews can easily be padded or misleading. Shopping in person removes that guesswork entirely. You get to feel the fabric, inspect the stitching, try things on in the fitting room, and know with complete certainty that an item is worth your money before you hand it over.
        Furthermore, physical shopping completely eliminates the anxiety of package logistics. Ordering online comes with an unavoidable waiting period filled with refreshing tracking numbers, delayed deliveries, and the constant fear of porch theft. If you need an outfit for an event this weekend or a specific supply for a project tomorrow, online shopping turns into a high-stakes guessing game with shipping estimates. Walking into a store, picking up the exact item you need, and carrying it out in a bag provides a level of instant satisfaction that no tracking link can match.
        There is also a tactile, social element to physical retail that digital spaces completely lack. Endless scrolling through online catalogs quickly becomes overwhelming, turning a simple errand into an exhausting blur of options. Browsing real shelves allows for genuine discovery and you often stumble across something unexpected that an algorithm would never have recommended to you. Making an afternoon out of going to the mall with friends turns shopping into an engaging, shared memory rather than an isolating screen activity.
        Convenience isn't just about saving physical steps; it’s about getting the right result without the hassle of returns, repacking boxes, and waiting for refund processing. Online retail certainly has its place for hard-to-find items, but the reliability, immediacy, and sensory confirmation of a physical store make it the clear winner for everyday purchases.

Aaliyah Sharma

Why Physical Books Are Better Than E-Books by Aaliyah Sharma

 Why Physical Books Are Better Than E-Books


         In an age where almost every aspect of our lives has been compressed into a glass screen, reading seemed like the last remaining sanctuary. Then came e-readers, promising to revolutionize the way we consume literature. On paper, the pitch is undeniably tempting: an entire personal library stored in a device that weighs less than a single paperback, complete with instant downloads, adjustable lighting, and endless portability. Yet, despite decades of technological upgrades trying to render paper obsolete, the traditional physical book remains superior. Reading is not merely a transaction of data from a screen to your brain; it is a sensory, emotional, and physical experience that digital code simply cannot replicate.
        The fundamental flaw of an e-reader is that it strips away the physical geography of a story. When you read a physical book, your brain naturally creates a spatial map of the text. You know intuitively that a key plot twist happened near the top left corner of a page about a quarter of the way into the thickness of the volume. Turning a real page gives you a concrete, tactile sense of progress—you can literally feel the remaining story shrinking in your right hand while the history builds in your left. On an e-reader, a story is just a uniform string of glowing text with a vague percentage bar at the bottom. Without physical milestones, the narrative feels weightless, making it much harder to truly retain information or forge a lasting memory of the book.
        Beyond cognition, there is the undeniable sensory ritual of reading a real book. The texture of rough paper under your thumb, the distinct smell of an old library volume, and the satisfying sound of a spine creaking open all contribute to a specific mindset. This physical engagement signals to your brain that it is time to slow down, disconnect, and focus. An e-reader, no matter how good its paper-white screen claims to be, is still an electronic device with a battery that can die and a interface that mirrors the gadgets we spend all day staring at for work and school. It brings the subtle fatigue of screen time into a space that should be a refuge from it.
        There is also something deeply personal about owning a physical collection. A bookshelf in someone's room acts as a visible portrait of their mind, showing where they’ve been, what they’ve cared about, and the stories that shaped them. You can lend a favorite paperback to a friend, scribble notes in the margins, or find a forgotten receipt tucked into page ninety as a bookmark from three years ago. Digital files stored on a cloud server lack that personal history; you don't really own them, you just license the right to view them on a glowing screen until the device becomes outdated.
       Convenience is certainly valuable for a long flight or a crowded commute, but convenience is not why we fall in love with reading. We read to immerse ourselves, to slow down in a fast-paced world, and to connect deeply with ideas outside our own. A physical book honors that intention by demanding your presence and offering a real, tangible weight in return. Technology may continue to streamline our lives, but when it comes to getting lost in a great story, nothing will ever replace the timeless charm of ink on paper.

Aaliyah Sharma

Monday, September 21, 2026

Apple TV Streaming by Samhita adapa

 Apple TV Streaming by Samhita adapa

Almost everyone’s got Netflix and maybe even Disney+. HBO Max if they’re lucky. But I bet you that what most people don’t have is Apple TV, which is insane because Apple's been consistently pumping out quality TV for almost years now. Home to some of the most popular shows in these years like Severance and Ted Lasso, Apple TV is nowhere near the popularity of other streaming services, although it may be higher than Paramount because I still haven’t met a single person who pays for that. 

Like probably literally everyone else on the globe, I only got Apple TV to watch Severance season 2. And when my family forgot to cancel after the season stopped airing, I looked through the catalog and realized to my surprise that there was an insane amount of TV shows that all looked extremely promising. Aside from Ted Lasso, which I think is also both extremely popular and good, Apple is knocking it out of the park with their TV, particularly their sci-fi shows. Silo, starring Rebecca Fergurson is great, and For All Mankinds is definitely worth a watch as well. And more recently, Pluribus, from Vince Gilligan, is absolutely fantastic and probably worth subscribing to for a couple months when the second season comes out. Aside from sci-fi, Pachinko is a great drama about Japanese occupation of Korea, and if you haven’t seen it already, Ted Lasso is awesome too. Aside from popularity and fans, their TV shows have been getting a lot of critical acclaim as well. Severance has gotten 41 nominations and 10 primetime Emmy wins. Ted Lasso has won 13 emmys as well as winning outstanding comedy series back to back in 2021 and 2022. So clearly, quality is not the issue here. They’ve been consistently producing good entertainment so what is the real root of the problem?

Catalog. Despite their multiple award winning shows, Apple TV does not have a good catalog. There are no seven season shows to binge watch nor does it have your favorite comfort series you rewatch when you’re sick.  Netflix has Gilmore Girls and The Walking Dead. HBO practically hit the jackpot with the amount of shows they have to watch, like Veep, GoT, Friends, or The Wire. Disney has practically all of their sitcoms, including the ones from Hulu now. Paramount’s got Avatar: The Last Airbender and Spongebob, I guess. Their catalogue just isn’t big enough and to be honest, the interface is a nightmare to navigate too. They have nothing to fall back on. $15 a month isn’t an amount you can just forget about either. And with the breaks between seasons now reaching almost two years, people don’t want to keep a service that has nothing to offer, especially with the amount of streaming platforms there are in general. To simply put it, the subscription isn’t worth the money. No matter how badly I wanted to watch the Studio, there was no way to justify the price to my parents. It’s more of a “get the 3 month free trial after buying a new phone and watch everything you want to before it runs out” type of service. That being said, if you ever end up getting the subscription or meeting someone who actually pays for it and is willing to share, I recommend watching Presumed Innocent.


Why Ben Shelton's US Open Loss Still Feels Like a Win by Nandan Kamalakannan

 Why Ben Shelton's US Open Loss Still Feels Like a Win by Nandan Kamalakannan


If you watched the 2026 US Open final, you already know what happened. Ben Shelton lost to Alexander

in four sets, 3-1.

It sounds like a major disappointment. You make it all the way to the final of the biggest tennis tournament

in the country, the whole crowd is going crazy for you, and then you lose. But honestly, watching Shelton

this entire tournament didn't feel like watching someone fail. It felt like a lesson in how to never give up.

To really get why Ben is the way he is, you have to look at his dad, Bryan Shelton. His dad was a pro

tennis player back in the day and then became a super successful college coach. He didn't just teach Ben

the physical mechanics of how to hit a ball. He taught him how to keep his head on straight.

You can see his dad's influence everywhere. Even with all the hype, the sponsorships, and the crazy

media attention, Ben stays completely grounded. He doesn’t walk around the court acting like he’s better

than everyone else. He just genuinely respects the sport and his opponents.

But we also have to talk about how he actually plays. His aggressive shots are insane. Every time he

steps up for a massive serve or winds up a heavy forehand, it honestly reminds me of watching old clips

of Pete Sampras. It’s that same explosive, fearless energy where you feel like the ball is going to leave a

mark on the court.

Even in the final against Alexander, when he was down in the sets and the pressure was huge, Shelton

refused to quit. He didn't drop his head or throw a tantrum when things went wrong. He just chased down

every single ball and fought for every point like his life depended on it—not just in this final match, but

throughout the entire tour.

At the end of the day, everyone wants to win the trophy. But staying humble, playing with everything you

have, and fighting until the very last second is what actually makes people remember you.

He might have lost the match, but Ben Shelton proved that sometimes how you play is way more

important than the final score.

Why Exercise Can Make You Happier: What Happens in Your Brain by Nandita Kamalakannan

 Why Exercise Can Make You Happier: What Happens in Your Brain 

by Nandita Kamalakannan


Have you ever gone for a run or finished a workout when you didn't really feel like exercising,

only to feel better afterward?

That feeling isn't just in your imagination.

Exercise doesn't only change what happens to your muscles and heart. It also changes what

happens inside your brain.

When we exercise, our heart rate increases and our body needs more oxygen. This causes greater

blood flow throughout the body, including the brain. But the interesting part is what happens

inside the brain as a result.

One of the best-known effects of exercise involves neurotransmitters. Neurotransmitters are

chemical messengers that allow nerve cells to communicate with each other.

Exercise can influence several neurotransmitter systems involved in mood, motivation, attention,

and stress.

One of them is dopamine.

Dopamine is involved in motivation, reward, attention, and learning. When you accomplish

something difficult during exercise—finishing a run, lifting a certain weight, or beating your

previous time—your brain's reward system can become involved.

That can make completing a challenging workout feel satisfying.

Another neurotransmitter involved in mood is serotonin. Exercise can affect serotonin signaling,


which is one reason physical activity is being studied for its effects on mood and emotional well-

being.


And then there are endorphins.

You may have heard people say that exercise releases endorphins. Endorphins are chemicals

produced by the body that can help reduce the perception of pain and contribute to positive

feelings during or after exercise.

But the story doesn't end there.


Exercise can also affect a protein called brain-derived neurotrophic factor, or BDNF.

BDNF helps support the growth, survival, and function of neurons. It is involved in processes

related to learning and memory. Physical activity can increase BDNF signaling, which is one

reason researchers are interested in the connection between exercise, brain health, and cognitive

function.

Exercise also interacts with the body's stress system.

When you're stressed, your body activates systems involving hormones such as cortisol. Exercise

itself is a physical stressor, but regular physical activity can help the body adapt to stress and

may influence how the stress-response system reacts over time.

This may help explain why going for a run after a stressful day can sometimes make your

problems feel a little more manageable.

There is another connection between exercise and the brain that teenagers should probably care

about: sleep.

Regular physical activity is associated with better sleep for many people. And sleep is extremely

important for the brain because it supports memory, learning, emotional regulation, and recovery.

So exercise can potentially create a cycle:

You exercise.

Your body and brain respond.

You sleep better.

Your brain gets time to recover and process information.

You may feel better the next day.

And then you're more prepared to be active again.

Of course, exercise isn't a magic solution for every emotional problem. Feeling sad, stressed, or

anxious is a normal part of life, and serious or persistent mental-health concerns deserve support

from trusted adults and health professionals.

But there is something pretty amazing about the fact that moving our bodies can affect our

brains.


We often think of exercise as something we do to become stronger, faster, or healthier physically.

Maybe we should also think of it as something we do for our brains.

The next time you put on your running shoes, go for a walk, ride a bike, or play a sport,

remember that you're not just training your muscles.

You're giving your brain a workout too.


Works Cited

"Benefits of Physical Activity." Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4 Dec. 2025,

www.cdc.gov/physical-activity-basics/benefits/ .

"Neurotransmitters: What They Are, Functions & Types." Cleveland Clinic, 14 Mar. 2022,

my.clevelandclinic.org/health/articles/22513-neurotransmitters .

"The Ultimate Brain Booster: Exercise and Mental Health." Stanford Lifestyle Medicine, 1 May

2024, lifestylemedicine.stanford.edu/the-ultimate-brain-booster-exercise-and-mental-health/ .